The sage Richard Russell said recently (my emboldening): As the world deleveraging process continues, commodity prices turn soft. Deleveraging means that people will be tightening their belts and using less [...]
Investing
As a forecaster, there is not much odds forecasting the end of the world. After all, it only happens once. If you are correct, presumably no one is left or in a position to take your advice again. No percentages, nothing to be gained! Somebody must really feel strongly about developments to issue such a forecast.
This interview with John Williams of Shadowstats.com is a must listen. His website is also worth a visit. Mr. Williams is the statistician/economist who re-calculates government-released statistics on the basis which they were originally calculated. That is, he removes all of the adjustments that have occurred over the years to make the numbers seem better.
H/T Mac Slavo
What if the following quote from Steve St. Angelo is correct?
For the most part, Americans are completely oblivious of just how close the country is to a total disintegration of its fiat monetary system. As I mentioned in the beginning of the article, the United States financial system died in 2008. It has been kept alive by policy deregulation, monetary printing, and market manipulation (including derivative manufacturing such as interest rate swaps). These collaborative short term machinations have a lifespan that is diminishing every passing day, while investors who have made the wise decision to exchange fiat money for gold and silver keep wondering how long this manipulation can continue.
Do you believe this?
What you or I believe is moot. The most interesting and irrelevant portion of the above paragraph to me is the quantity of people who are “oblivious of just how close the country is to a total disintegration of its fiat monetary system.” From an academic standpoint, knowledge of this quantity might help validate H. L. Mencken’s opinion of the American group IQ (“No one in this world has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people.”). Other than that it is of no practical import.
The validity of the paragraph is independent of the number of people who expect something to happen. Tsunamis occur when no one expects them to. And so it is with mega events like currency and economic collapses. Because they have never happened before (where before is defined in our lifetime), most people assume they are “impossible.”
I was jolted out of this type of confirmation bias early in my career. As a newly minted, cocky MBA, I was presented an analysis to the Controller of a Fortune 100 company. I was probably 25. He seemed imposing and appeared to be about 100 years old (but was probably only 50). He drilled me on alternative assumptions and how they could effect outcomes. At one point he asked about an event that seemed so far-fetched that I responded that it was impossible. I can still see his stare and hear his words: “Son, the impossible has a 20% probability!” Over the years, this comment has served me well.
His description preceded the popular term today — “black swan” — but its meaning was the same. Black swans do exist and the impossible does not. That is especially so in our times where we have extended and abused
economics to its breaking point. As a result, black swans circle the skies. Where they land or choose to defecate is unknown, but it is a certainty that they cannot refrain from either forever. We are entering a period which can be characterized by Peter Drucker’s term “discontinuities.” The late Mr. Drucker used the term to describe breakthroughs in technologies that were impossible to extrapolate. Were he alive and witnessing what is happening today, it is likely he would have applied the term to economics. So many of our economic tools and methodologies are spent via overuse and abuse that we face major breakdowns in what we have taken for granted for our entire lives. Woe be the investor or economist who depends upon extrapolation as a means of projecting the future.
Regarding the recommendation of precious metals in the quoted paragraph above, it, like every other investment class, is a gamble. Good investors are ones who recognize there are no sure things. Great investors do not make money on every trade. But they do on the majority of their trades. They do not fall in love with an asset or asset class. They determine, to the best of their abilities, what the odds are of winning and the payoffs if they are right or wrong. Once they have found an investment with what they consider favorable arithmetic, they invest. So long as their assessments are reasonable and their bets are diversified, the law of large numbers assure they win on balance. Judgment and prudence are all that is necessary. Time and outcomes do the rest.
The probabilities look more favorable for silver and gold than anything else that I have seen in my investing career. In hindsight, that assessment 11 years ago would have produced eleven consecutive years of profits (in the range of 15% per annum) in a period when the stock market declined or failed miserably to keep up with inflation. Will that performance be continued?
To me, the discontinuities ahead suggest that it will. But that is far from certainty and all investments are risky! Go there, if you choose, fully aware of the risks which can only be assessed in terms of your own judgment, needs, personal situation and portfolio. If you choose to do so, make sure that you maintain proper diversification. Never place all your marbles on a “sure thing” where it is “impossible” to lose. It isn’t and you will.
The spiral into insolvency continues, despite government’s efforts to make you believe that there is a recovery. At this point, this country is too far gone. It is mathematically impossible to service the debt. Furthermore, the debt burden makes it impossible to regenerate reasonable economic growth. The end has been determined, only the timing remains to be known.
For politicians (and it does not matter which party), the only remaining strategy is to use bailing wire to hold matters together from one election to the next. Unfortunately, the supply of bailing wire is now scarce. Will we last until November 2012 before a financial collapse or some other event uncovers the fraud? That is hard to tell, but the postponement of reality is all that drives the political approach to economic policy.
The employment report this past week showed a substantial rise in new hires, although it was not enough to reflect a true recovery. The mainstream media, desperate for some good news in order to support their candidate Barack Obama, trumpeted the results as an inflection point in the economic “recovery.” There is no economic recovery! Nor will there be one until an economic collapse of historical magnitude occurs.
The increased hiring is welcome, but do not believe it is indicative of a turnaround. The drop in the unemployment rate has been highlighted “the lowest in three years.” Few choose to point out the games played in the measurement of this rate or bother to cite the incongruity of how another 1.2 million workers left the workforce last month. (Here is Rick Santelli’s take.)
The stock market, no longer an investment vehicle but a large roulette wheel, took off roaring in anticipation of “happy times are here again.” Do not be fooled by this burst of euphoria. Nothing has changed other than the pulse beats of the gamblers.
Lets try to put matters into a bit more perspective. Here are three excerpts from Continue reading »

The Dollar is doomed. So too are most other fiat currencies. It is the nature of fiat currencies and the nature of governments throughout history.
All countries have abused their citizenry and investors via the printing press. Since the formation of the Federal Reserve in 1913, the dollar has lost 96% of its value. Most of that loss has occurred since 1970. It was 1971 when the U.S. officially defaulted on its promise to redeem dollars for gold. That marked the point where, for the first time in modern history, gold was completely removed from any role in the world monetary system. Then, there was no hard constraint to prevent any country from inflating its currency. All did!
With the dollar as the reserve currency of the world, the U.S. has had (and used) advantages not available to, but coveted by other countries. At times, our monetary policy has forced (at least in the opinion of foreign policy makers) inflation onto other countries. Behind the scenes there has been resentment building toward U.S. dollar hegemony for decades. Part of this resentment results from US abuses, part results from other countries wanting a similar ability to plunder. The current financial crisis, arguably begun in the U.S., has exacerbated both of these sentiments.
We were at an impasse with Europe over proper monetary and fiscal policy. In The Keynesian Dead End the conflict was described:
Now the political and fiscal bills are coming due even as the U.S. and European economies are merely muddling along. The Europeans have had enough and want to swear off the sauce, while the Obama Administration wants to keep running a bar tab.
Even the progenitor of Keynesian economics, England, was abandoning the model by implementing spending cuts and tax increases, despite the major recession. The U.S.was and still is unwilling to bite this bullet, despite signs that other governments have lost faith in the U.S. and its dollar reserve system. The US continues to stimulate, primarily via the creation of credit.
Recently, as the economic crisis worsened in Europe, politicians backed away from their “austerity” moves. Their central bank began creating money to flood the ailing banking system so as to avoid individual or multiple banking system failure. When the Greek panic struck, the dollar benefited. However, it benefited primarily relative to the Euro. Did the dollar strengthen or did the Euro merely weaken? Certainly the dollar strengthened relative to the Euro, but both deteriorated against gold, now near all-time highs in both currencies. In other words, both currencies weakened, but the Euro did so faster than the dollar.
Were there any alternative to the dollar, the U.S. would already have lose its monetary hegemony. That does not mean that other countries are not feverishly working behind the scenes to create one. Several meetings have taken place, without the U.S., to develop a substitute. Only the vagaries of history enable the dollar to continue, at least for a time, as the world currency. This important perquisite may be near its demise.
Financial Sense Online provides evidence of declining faith in the dollar:
In another ominous sign for the dollar, the Financial Times reported Wednesday that after two decades as net sellers of gold, foreign central banks have now become net buyers. What’s more, more than half of central bank officials surveyed by UBS didn’t think the dollar would be the world’s reserve in 2035. Among the predicted replacements were Asian currencies and the euro, but – by far – the favorite was gold. This is supported by Monday’s revelation by the Saudi central bank that it had covertly doubled its gold reserves, just about a year after China made a similar admission. There is no reason to assume these are isolated incidents, or that the covert trade of dollars for gold doesn’t continue. To the contrary, this is compelling evidence that foreign governments are outwardly supporting the status quo while quietly preparing for the dollar’s almost-inevitable devaluation.
Sophisticated investors are moving money into gold. That and rising gold prices are signs that something is happening. The value of all fiat currencies is moving toward Voltaire’s definition of their “intrinsic value” — zero.
Matters approach a critical state around the world. Most of the advanced economies, including the U.S., are insolvent (see here and here). It is mathematically impossible for these countries to avoid defaults on financial and social obligations. Spending cuts and tax hikes are also inevitable. The tipping point for such actions was passed years ago.
Europe’s situation is unique because one central bank serves different countries. Their announced austerity programs are too little too late. As the politicians experience the social unrest and potential risk of civil war(s), these efforts will be abandoned. They, like the US, will avoid the hard decisions to cut back programs and spending and turn to more monetary stimulus and bailouts. Instead of fixing the problems, politicians will sacrifice their currencies. So is the way of politics — never impose pain. Instead the game will be kept going via inflationary expansion of money and credit until fiat currencies collapse.
If the U.S. continues to stimulate, the devaluation of the dollar will harm “responsible” countries, as they will become less competitive in terms of exchange rates. Whether intended or not, this strategy is identical to the “beggar thy neighbor” policy that was employed during the 1930s. History shows that such behavior leads to competitive devaluations or even war. No country can gain at the expense of another under this policy, except for a short period. The policy is nothing more than a race to the bottom. All countries end up conforming to the policies of the least responsible one. All currencies are destroyed in such a competition.
It is not practicable to forecast the process or rate at which world currency debasement plays out. There are too many market and political variables. It will continue, because it is the only political alternative to default on real and promised obligations. Currency purchasing power is headed down. All currencies will not all head down in relative terms,(measured against one another in terms of exchange rates); that is mathematically impossible. But they all will head down in terms of purchasing power or when measured against gold and other scarce commodities. Against gold all currencies have been in consistent decline for more than a decade. Although an imperfect measure of loss of purchasing power, it took $250 to purchase an ounce of gold a decade ago. Today, it takes over $1700!
Got Gold?
(Part II will follow later this week)
Inflation or Deflation Before The Unavoidable Depression?
The argument persists as to whether our current economic crisis will end with massive inflation or in a deflationary spiral. Ultimately, either one results in a Depression. For investors, this [...]
Russell on Markets
It is nice to see that Richard Russell, famed octogenarian investment newsletter author, has apparently recovered fully from his recent setback. This quote is an example of his outlook on [...]
The Year That Was
A worthwhile recap of the year: 2011 Year in Review: Signs of an American Spring and a Fourth Turning Friday, December 30, 2011, 11:54 pm, by Adam [Every year, friend-of-the-site David [...]
Diversify Your Holdings Against Predatory Government
The economic times we have been through and will continue to experience are unlike anything this country has faced since the 1930s. All signs suggest that these conditions are still [...]
Gold Bugs
A blurb from DJ newswires talks about First Eagle Gold Fund. I know nothing about this fund and am not recommending it. For those interested in gold, you might want [...]
The Stock Market in Perspective
On the roller coaster that we call the stock market, it is easy to miss the forest for the trees. Volatile short-term moves are especially pronounced in today’s economic environment. [...]
Yesterday’s Stock Market Rally Courtesy of Government Ponzi
Yesterday was a big day in the stock market! The Central Banks of the world came to the rescue of Europe, at least that is what you are supposed to believe. [...]









Redd Foxx's "Big One?"
Probable Cautions on SLV and GLD
Forget about Economic Recovery in 2011
Diversify Your Holdings Against Predatory Government
Russell on Markets
Gold Biding Time?
Mish's Economic and Investment Themes for 2011
Some Information on Silver
Reality According to Jim Rogers
The Hangover From Hell Lies Ahead
Does College Pay?
Recent Comments