<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Monty Pelerin&#039;s World &#187; bias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.economicnoise.com/category/economics/economic-bias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.economicnoise.com</link>
	<description>Economics, Finance and Politics Through The Prism of Classical Liberalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:22:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Ferguson &#8212; The Corruption of Economics</title>
		<link>http://www.economicnoise.com/2010/12/26/charles-ferguson-the-corruption-of-economics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.economicnoise.com/2010/12/26/charles-ferguson-the-corruption-of-economics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 14:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Monty Pelerin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption of economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicnoise.com/?p=16903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One man&#8217;s opinion of how we got into this mess. For some additional information on Ferguson, see the H/T reference below. H/T Naked Capitalism Share/Save]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.economicnoise.com/2010/12/26/charles-ferguson-the-corruption-of-economics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economists Have No Clothes</title>
		<link>http://www.economicnoise.com/2010/12/03/economists-have-no-clothes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.economicnoise.com/2010/12/03/economists-have-no-clothes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Monty Pelerin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Econ 201]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Favorites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economists have no clothes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Buchanan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicnoise.com/?p=16200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Economics as taught and practiced these days has been severely removed from its original methodology. It is a social science that has been dominated by physical science methodologies. It suffers from what Friedrich Hayek termed &#8220;scientism.&#8221; James M. Buchanan, Nobel Laureate, is ninety years old and one of the great economists of our time. His <a href='http://www.economicnoise.com/2010/12/03/economists-have-no-clothes/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.economicnoise.com/2010/12/03/economists-have-no-clothes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bad Results Continue</title>
		<link>http://www.economicnoise.com/2010/01/07/the-bad-results-continue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.economicnoise.com/2010/01/07/the-bad-results-continue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Monty Pelerin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross domestic product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicnoise.com/?p=8391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[December tax results disappoint. This from the Wall Street Examiner: Month to date tax receipts are now in for the entire month of December. They’re down 7.7% from December 2008, which is exactly the same rate of decline as November’s. We know that the TBAC and Treasury officials were not anticipating that in their debt <a href='http://www.economicnoise.com/2010/01/07/the-bad-results-continue/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.economicnoise.com/2010/01/07/the-bad-results-continue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employment Worsens Despite Headlines</title>
		<link>http://www.economicnoise.com/2009/11/05/employment-worsens-despite-headlines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.economicnoise.com/2009/11/05/employment-worsens-despite-headlines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Monty Pelerin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denninger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seasonal adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicnoise.com/?p=5701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia Good job numbers today &#8212; NOT! Once again we have the headlines and reality diverging. Karl Denninger provides an analysis of why the job situation is worsening rather than the &#8220;improvements&#8221; that are being heralded. Watch The Distortions (UIC Data) The Market Ticker Thursday, November 5. 2009 Posted by Karl Denninger in <a href='http://www.economicnoise.com/2009/11/05/employment-worsens-despite-headlines/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.economicnoise.com/2009/11/05/employment-worsens-despite-headlines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is Smarter, the Media or the Public?</title>
		<link>http://www.economicnoise.com/2009/10/31/who-is-smarter-the-media-or-the-public/</link>
		<comments>http://www.economicnoise.com/2009/10/31/who-is-smarter-the-media-or-the-public/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Monty Pelerin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economicnoise.com/?p=5161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia Is there any doubt why the major media audience is dropping like a rock? This headline suggests that 96% of the sample believes they are better informed than reporters. If so, why waste time with newspapers or TV?  It is a scary number. I am not sure whether it says more about <a href='http://www.economicnoise.com/2009/10/31/who-is-smarter-the-media-or-the-public/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.economicnoise.com/2009/10/31/who-is-smarter-the-media-or-the-public/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

