Rules For Thee But Not For Me

Rules for thee but not for me are normal for the political elite versus the citizens they are supposed to represent. Recently, two Federal Reserve bank presidents resigned, presumably over a form of “insider trading” (they traded in advance of Fed policy announcements). Members of Congress are routinely accused of similar behavior.
Now, it is possible (likely?) that we have “Meds for me but not for thee” as the latest abomination of rulers vs. ruled or the anointed class versus the serf class. Here is Market Ticker’s take on what may be a new low on rules for thee but not for me:
If This Is True….

… why are you still willing to put up with the bull**** surrounding Covid-19 in any form whatsoever?

Fun fact: Between 100-200 United States Congress Members (plus many of their staffers & family members) with COVID.. were treated by a colleague over the past 15 months with ivermectin & the I-MASK+ protocol at http://flccc.net. None have gone to hospital. Just sayin’

There are 535 members of Congress.  On the lower boundary this is 19% of the members, plus staff and family or close to one in five.  On the upper boundary it is more than a third.

Remember folks that doctors have been threatened with loss of their medical licenses for writing prescriptions and chain pharmacies, which are most of them, have in many cases refused to fill said prescriptions.  The entire reason people have gone out and bought “pony paste” is that they can’t go to the local doc-in-a-box and get a script for Ivermectin.

Incidentally I trust animal meds in this sort of context far more than human ones.  Go kill someone’s tens-of-millions of dollar racehorse and see how long you live.  Whack Fluffy and it will be all over the news for a week with the responsible vet run out of town.  But killing Granny, if you’re a hospital and can come up with a positive PCR test you get a $33,000 bounty — and everyone, including the media, yawns.

Do I believe Ivermectin is the entire answer?  No.  It wasn’t for me, and I used it when I got Covid in early August.  But was it part of the answer?  I believe it was.  It certainly didn’t kill me and on the data it is about 100 times safer than Tylenol.  We have 40 years of data on its safety and it has a risk of seriously harming you of about 1 in 600,000.  With close to four billion human doses dispensed and consumed that data is pretty solid; I certainly trust it.

Can you OD on it or worse, find some product that has it and other things in it too and those other drugs are unsafe (or at least untested) in humans?  Certainly.  But remember folks: We had an out-and-out fraud, a actual medical practitioner, who stated their entire ER was full of people who poisoned themselves with the drug.  The hospital, a day or two later when they realized they had been named, issued a formal statement that exactly zero persons had shown up in their Emergency Room having been poisoned by self-administration of Ivermectin.

Did anyone go to prison for this lie?  Nope.  Did that person’s medical ticket get punched permanently for their false presentation?  Nope.  What sanction was placed on said person for their intentional fraud?  None.

Is Covid serious?  It certainly can be.  While there are predictors of increased risk the fact is that just as with any drug who gets hammered and who does not is not certain.  I used a prophylactic protocol for close to a year and a half and despite somewhere around two dozen known exposures I did not get the virus.  I was still using that protocol when I finally did get the virus via an exposure that was close enough to get me, but was hardly as close as many of the others.  I also was under a serious immune assault due to a yellowjacket swarm during the incubation period; without that I might well have once again avoided infection.  There’s no way for me to know that with any degree of certainty.

But as with every other viral disease known to mankind contracting the disease and fighting it off produces strong immunity.  This one is no exception.  We have never jabbed people who got a viral disease in the past; it is medically stupid and no doctor will do it because it is the definition of malpractice to give someone a drug, all of which have risk, without any possibility of a benefit.  No doctor will give you a chicken pox or measles shot if you’ve had the diseases.

People like to talk about the flu shot but the flu shot is in fact different every year because we have to guess what flu strains will circulate in a given year.  Nonetheless if you had a given strain and got hammered by it the odds of getting hammered by the same strain a second time are vanishingly small.  Not zero, but very small — even years later.  H1N1, the 1918 pandemic flu, faded off into obscurity within a couple of years.  Did it disappear?  No; people who had it and didn’t die kept getting re-challenged, some of them got sick but statistically speaking nobody got very sick or was killed by it after the first time around.  I remind you that H1N1 came around in both the 2009 and 2019/2020 flu seasons, was not in the shot, and made plenty of people real sick — including me the first week of January 2020.  How many people in the first “surge” of Covid were co-infected with H1N1 influenza yet their death was “credited” to Covid?  We’ll never know but the number is likely very large since there was a bounty for toe tags with Covid on them but none if the cause was listed as H1N1 influenza.  That was a nasty flu too; my personal experience with it was more-severe than Delta Covid in August of 2021!

OC43, another beta coronavirus in the same family as Covid-19, is believed to have caused a pandemic in the 1890s.  Today it circulates and causes colds.  Occasionally, particularly in old people, it nails them hard and kills them through mechanisms that look an awful lot like Covid.  Why?  Because as you get old your immune response wanes and so their former exposure, which probably dates back to their childhood and then is enhanced by repeated challenges, becomes insufficient.

Treating people to improve survival rates produces a group of people with robust, durable immunity.  You can’t eradicate Covid as it has animal reservoirs; it is with us forever.  You want people to acquire durable immunity and you want them to be re-challenged and further reinforce that immunity.  The jabs do the exact opposite on the data; they give you temporary protection but when it wanes, and the data is that it does so within six months, you get ****ed as if you never had any protection at all or even worse, the jabs may be enhancing disease at that point.

If in fact Congress, their staff and families have been using the very process I just described while screwing everyone else by banning it either explicitly or implicitly then they are all murderous *******s. 

Exactly why does the public allow such abject fraud to be run upon them?  We’re all used to lies out of Congress and the Executive; that’s what they do best.

But now we have an allegation that with these lies they’re killing Americans — literally — by arguing against and permitting outright bans on the use of the very intervention they themselves are using to beat back this virus.

The link to the original article is here: Market Ticker

Recent Posts

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.