Hans-Herman Hoppe is a man who has been painted as a kook, radical and many other epithets. These epithets are standard fare for those unwilling to deal argument. Ad hominem attacks are not refutations of ideas. merely the refuge of scoundrels promoting a logically indefensible agenda.
Hoppe is considered dangerous to big government because his ideas question the very purpose and validity of government. He is philosophically an anarcho-capitalistst. Dr. Hoppe’s ideas are “extreme” when measured against the prevailing opinion of the time. I find reading him thought-provoking and challenging, because it is difficult to refute his logic.
His take on the State is valuable. Like some of our founders and others before and after them, he considers the State an evil. From a philosophic standpoint, he believes that all functions of government can be better executed via private efforts, including even defense. For some, this position seems preposterous. Reading him and his mentor Murray Rothbard make these ideas seem not so unreasonable.
An overview of Hoppe can be obtained from this informative interview in The Daily Bell. It provides a taste of his positions and the logic behind them.
Whether one agrees or disagrees with Hoppe (and Rothbard), it is worth learning his positions, something no government school would encourage. Even if you disagree with most of what are considered his more extreme positions, his work will make you think, test your own ideas and understand the issues more clearly. Regardless of where you come out, he will put into perspective the Leviathan that our current government represents.
For those interested in pursuing Hoppe’s ideas further, he has authored many books. Most are available at mises.org and some are on-line.



Hey ! I’m a french reader of your website, and actually i read it everyday, so continue like this i like it
(sorry for my english by the way)
I searched how to mail you but i didn’t find, so i put it here, i’m sorry about it.
You wrote an article about Richard Cantillon (one of my favorite economists) but you just did something wrong in the picture, no big deal, but i was like “wtf ?” when i read it cause you said “nobody knows him” and you put a photo of Adam Smith and just under it you put “Richard Cantillon”. ^^
http://www.economicnoise.com/2010/09/27/stupid-economists/
So the picture you put is Adem Smith, this is a picture of Cantillon :
http://www.africanliberty.org/images/cantillon.JPG
That one is the best i could find sorry, because there is not a lot of Cantillon’s picture on the Internet.. as you said.. “Most people do not recognize the name Richard Cantillon.” .. so how could people do recognize his picture ? ahah
Again i’m sorry of posting in this news but i didn’t find your mail, and i’m also sorry for my english.
Have a good day ! Continue like that ! We like you !
Florent.
Florent,
Thank you for your kind comments and your catch of my error. (I never was very good recognizing faces.) It appears you are correct.
I have been having some trouble with the website. Contact information (usually on the site) is [email protected].
Monty