Paul Craig Roberts describes what may happen to the economy and his solution to preventing it.
In recent years, it seems to me that Mr. Roberts has become a bit extreme, if not eccentric. Nevertheless, I believe his scenario for how the downturn plays out is plausible. For those wrestling with this issue, the article is likely worthwhile. While this process is impossible to forecast with any degree of certitude, well-reasoned opinions often present factors that might have been overlooked.
I am not impressed with some of his causes and solutions.
The Ecstasy of Empire
Paul Craig Roberts
Infowars.com
August 16, 2010The United States is running out of time to get its budget and trade deficits under control. Despite the urgency of the situation, 2010 has been wasted in hype about a non-existent recovery. As recently as August 2 Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner penned a New York Times column, “Welcome to the Recovery.”
Without a revolution, Americans are history. As John Williams (shadowstats.com) has made clear on many occasions, an appearance of recovery was created by over-counting employment and undercounting inflation. Warnings by Williams, Gerald Celente, and myself have gone unheeded, but our warnings recently had echoes from Boston University professor Laurence Kotlikoff and from David Stockman, who excoriated the Republican Party for becoming big-spending Democrats.
It is encouraging to see some realization that, this time, Washington cannot spend the economy out of recession. The deficits are already too large for the dollar to survive as reserve currency, and deficit spending cannot put Americans back to work in jobs that have been moved offshore.
However, the solutions offered by those who are beginning to recognize that there is a problem are discouraging. Kotlikoff thinks the solution is savage Social Security and Medicare cuts or equally savage tax increases or hyperinflation to destroy the vast debts.
Perhaps economists lack imagination, or perhaps they don’t want to be cut off from Wall Street and corporate subsidies, but Social Security and Medicare are insufficient at their present levels, especially considering the erosion of private pensions by the dot com, derivative and real estate bubbles. Cuts in Social Security and Medicare, for which people have paid 15 per cent of their earnings all their lives, would result in starvation and deaths from curable diseases.
Tax increases make even less sense. It is widely acknowledged that the majority of households cannot survive on one job. Both husband and wife work and often one of the partners has two jobs in order to make ends meet. Raising taxes makes it harder to make ends meet–thus more foreclosures, more food stamps, more homelessness. What kind of economist or humane person thinks this is a solution?
Ah, but we will tax the rich. The rich have enough money. They will simply stop earning.
Let’s get real. Here is what the government is likely to do. Once Washington realize that the dollar is at risk and that they can no longer finance their wars by borrowing abroad, the government will either levy a tax on private pensions on the grounds that the pensions have accumulated tax-deferred, or the government will require pension fund managers to purchase Treasury debt with our pensions. This will buy the government a bit more time while pension accounts are loaded up with worthless paper.
The last Bush budget deficit (2008) was in the $400-500 billion range, about the size of the Chinese, Japanese, and OPEC trade surpluses with the US. Traditionally, these trade surpluses have been recycled to the US and finance the federal budget deficit. In 2009 and 2010 the federal deficit jumped to $1,400 billion, a back-to-back trillion dollar increase. There are not sufficient trade surpluses to finance a deficit this large. From where comes the money?
The answer is from individuals fleeing the stock market into “safe” Treasury bonds and from the bankster bailout, not so much the TARP money as the Federal Reserve’s exchange of bank reserves for questionable financial paper such as subprime derivatives. The banks used their excess reserves to purchase Treasury debt.
These financing maneuvers are one-time tricks. Once people have fled stocks, that movement into Treasuries is over. The opposition to the bankster bailout likely precludes another. So where does the money come from the next time?
The Treasury was able to unload a lot of debt thanks to “the Greek crisis,” which the New York banksters and hedge funds multiplied into “the euro crisis.” The financial press served as a financing arm for the US Treasury by creating panic about European debt and the euro. Central banks and individuals who had taken refuge from the dollar in euros were panicked out of their euros, and they rushed into dollars by purchasing US Treasury debt.
This movement from euros to dollars weakened the alternative reserve currency to the dollar, halted the dollar’s decline, and financed the US budget deficit a while longer.
Possibly the game can be replayed with Spanish debt, Irish debt, and whatever unlucky country is eswept in by the thoughtless expansion of the European Union.
But when no countries remain that can be destabilized by Wall Street investment banksters and hedge funds, what then finances the US budget deficit?
The only remaining financier is the Federal Reserve. When Treasury bonds brought to auction do not sell, the Federal Reserve must purchase them. The Federal Reserve purchases the bonds by creating new demand deposits, or checking accounts, for the Treasury. As the Treasury spends the proceeds of the new debt sales, the US money supply expands by the amount of the Federal Reserve’s purchase of Treasury debt.
Do goods and services expand by the same amount? Imports will increase as US jobs have been offshored and given to foreigners, thus worsening the trade deficit. When the Federal Reserve purchases the Treasury’s new debt issues, the money supply will increase by more than the supply of domestically produced goods and services. Prices are likely to rise.
How high will they rise? The longer money is created in order that government can pay its bills, the more likely hyperinflation will be the result.
The economy has not recovered. By the end of this year it will be obvious that the collapsing economy means a larger than $1.4 trillion budget deficit to finance. Will it be $2 trillion? Higher?
Whatever the size, the rest of the world will see that the dollar is being printed in such quantities that it cannot serve as reserve currency. At that point wholesale dumping of dollars will result as foreign central banks try to unload a worthless currency.
Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)
The collapse of the dollar will drive up the prices of imports and offshored goods on which Americans are dependent. Wal-Mart shoppers will think they have mistakenly gone into Neiman Marcus.
Domestic prices will also explode as a growing money supply chases the supply of goods and services still made in America by Americans.
The dollar as reserve currency cannot survive the conflagration. When the dollar goes the US cannot finance its trade deficit. Therefore, imports will fall sharply, thus adding to domestic inflation and, as the US is energy import-dependent, there will be transportation disruptions that will disrupt work and grocery store deliveries.
Panic will be the order of the day.
Will farms will be raided? Will those trapped in cities resort to riots and looting?
Is this the likely future that “our” government and “our patriotic” corporations have created for us?
To borrow from Lenin, “What can be done?”
Here is what can be done. The wars, which benefit no one but the military-security complex and Israel’s territorial expansion, can be immediately ended. This would reduce the US budget deficit by hundreds of billions of dollars per year. More hundreds of billions of dollars could be saved by cutting the rest of the military budget which, in its present size, exceeds the budgets of all the serious military powers on earth combined.
US military spending reflects the unaffordable and unattainable crazed neoconservative goal of US Empire and world hegemony. What fool in Washington thinks that China is going to finance US hegemony over China?
The only way that the US will again have an economy is by bringing back the offshored jobs. The loss of these jobs impoverished Americans while producing oversized gains for Wall Street, shareholders, and corporate executives. These jobs can be brought home where they belong by taxing corporations according to where value is added to their product. If value is added to their goods and services in China, corporations would have a high tax rate. If value is added to their goods and services in the US, corporations would have a low tax rate.
This change in corporate taxation would offset the cheap foreign labor that has sucked jobs out of America, and it would rebuild the ladders of upward mobility that made America an opportunity society.
If the wars are not immediately stopped and the jobs brought back to America, the US is relegated to the trash bin of history.
Obviously, the corporations and Wall Street would use their financial power and campaign contributions to block any legislation that would reduce short-term earnings and bonuses by bringing jobs back to America. Americans have no greater enemies than Wall Street and the corporations and their prostitutes in Congress and the White House.
The neocons allied with Israel, who control both parties and much of the media, are strung out on the ecstasy of Empire.
The United States and the welfare of its 300 million people cannot be restored unless the neocons, Wall Street, the corporations, and their servile slaves in Congress and the White House can be defeated.
Without a revolution, Americans are history.


Tavakoli on Gold and Credit Default Swaps
Redd Foxx's "Big One?"
Becoming Poorer
Meredith Whitney is Half Right
Economic Death -- Choose Your Poison
Steve Golay, well said! Our fate hinges upon our treatment of Israel. God holds the plumb line in his hand.
What needs to be “gutted” is the belly of common man feeding at the tough – the corn meal not being the harvest of his labors. Think CALPERS. Think Section 8 housing. Think food stamps. Think state employees double dipping via too early or fraudulent retiring. Think of businesses overloading their daily bread with the butter of government contracts. Think the gutless fools who refuse to challenge the environmental tyranny, the stranaglehold of minnows and frogs on the livelihoods of men and women. Think of 100 of thousands of jobs buried along with the mineral deposits of our mountains and plains, black-topped over with the dogmas of environmentalism the religion. Think of education shackled to self-serving employee unions and administrative pocket-liners. Think of taxes far too high and of a currency higher still, floating to the burning sun of the light of day.
But do not, do not gut what the state is ordained to do by both the Constitution and God himself – the defense of the people. OK, I’ll say, the defense of the plumb-line God dropped into history and among all nations – the Jews.
Mr. Roberts, I’ve seen you try to yank on this plumb-line before – hoping for what? Pull this one down and all righteousness goes with it – including the ways and means of righteous economics.
What a nutcase.
As is so often the case, truth is mixed with fantasy and erroneous assumption to arrive at nonsensical conclusions.
Roberts is clearly anti-military, anti-Israel and anti: “neocons, Wall Street, the corporations, and their servile slaves in Congress and the White House”. Roberts correctly asserts that, “Tax increases make even less sense.” then proposes to force corporations to bring jobs back to the US through a rigged taxation scheme, essentially endorsing protectionism. Proposing that by raising taxes on corporations, we’ll create more jobs. Where corporations will get the money to open new American factories and train a new workforce, while being able to compete with .86 cents an hour Chinese labor, he conveniently omits.
He says nothing about correcting the Fed abuses nor of reestablishing a connection between the dollar and a real, actual store of value, such as gold. The disconnection of which led to the obscene credit expansion that forced jobs off-shore in the first place.
Roberts reveals through his assertions that he hasn’t the vaguest understanding of the realities driving US foreign policy, nor of Israel’s situation. Then he falsely asserts that Israel is engaged in territorial expansion, dishonestly implying that expanding Jewish settlement in former Palestinian territory is the result of some kind of “Ecstasy of Empire”.
Instead of the actual reason, an attempt to force the Palestinians to the bargaining table and compel them to negotiate in good faith by facing the Palestinians with an existential reality; either make peace now or gradually lose more and more territory to Israeli settlements until Gaza and the West Bank are gone and they end up losing it all.
He ignores the central reality that compels our presence in Afghanistan, the WoT and denying Al Qaeda another base from which to operate. He ignores the central assertion of the neocons; that unless democracy is somehow introduced to the M.E. the WoT can never be won and that the alternative is unimaginable bloodshed.
By asserting that the military can be gutted he ignores the lessons of history, relying on ‘magical thinking’ and ignores the geo-political trends that make a strong US military an existential necessity.
The fact of the matter is that Americans “have no greater enemy” than ignorance and muddled thinking, which prevents actual solutions from being implemented.